Switch to MIT license #213

Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Pollen from the LGPL to MIT.

Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of you, the esteemed contributors.

If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license."

On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove your code. Thanks.

Consistent with [Racket’s overall relicensing](https://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/11/completing-racket-s-relicensing-effort.html) from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Pollen from the LGPL to MIT. Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of you, the esteemed contributors. If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license." On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove your code. Thanks.

I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license.

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 14:39, Matthew Butterick notifications@github.com
wrote:

@leafac https://github.com/leafac
@sorawee https://github.com/sorawee
@LeifAndersen https://github.com/LeifAndersen
@samth https://github.com/samth
@otherjoel https://github.com/otherjoel
@jonboiser https://github.com/jonboiser
@j3parker https://github.com/j3parker
@AlexKnauth https://github.com/AlexKnauth
@tcondit https://github.com/tcondit
@rrthomas https://github.com/rrthomas
@odanoburu https://github.com/odanoburu
@matiasz https://github.com/matiasz
@gmlewis https://github.com/gmlewis
@bennn https://github.com/bennn
@basus https://github.com/basus
@Singletoned https://github.com/Singletoned

Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing
https://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/11/completing-racket-s-relicensing-effort.html
from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Pollen from the LGPL to MIT.

Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of
you, the esteemed contributors.

If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense
my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license."

On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove
your code. Thanks.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/mbutterick/pollen/issues/213?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAEHZSV5FCIU3GXRBPK7SDQUP3B5A5CNFSM4JPEKFU2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4H2LUO3A,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEHZWHYW6WWFOQ2XBO6ALQUP3B5ANCNFSM4JPEKFUQ
.

--
https://rrt.sc3d.org

I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license. On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 14:39, Matthew Butterick <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @leafac <https://github.com/leafac> > @sorawee <https://github.com/sorawee> > @LeifAndersen <https://github.com/LeifAndersen> > @samth <https://github.com/samth> > @otherjoel <https://github.com/otherjoel> > @jonboiser <https://github.com/jonboiser> > @j3parker <https://github.com/j3parker> > @AlexKnauth <https://github.com/AlexKnauth> > @tcondit <https://github.com/tcondit> > @rrthomas <https://github.com/rrthomas> > @odanoburu <https://github.com/odanoburu> > @matiasz <https://github.com/matiasz> > @gmlewis <https://github.com/gmlewis> > @bennn <https://github.com/bennn> > @basus <https://github.com/basus> > @Singletoned <https://github.com/Singletoned> > > Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing > <https://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/11/completing-racket-s-relicensing-effort.html> > from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Pollen from the LGPL to MIT. > > Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of > you, the esteemed contributors. > > If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense > my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license." > > On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove > your code. Thanks. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/mbutterick/pollen/issues/213?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAEHZSV5FCIU3GXRBPK7SDQUP3B5A5CNFSM4JPEKFU2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4H2LUO3A>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEHZWHYW6WWFOQ2XBO6ALQUP3B5ANCNFSM4JPEKFUQ> > . > -- https://rrt.sc3d.org

I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license.

@LeifAndersen? @tcondit? You’re the last holdouts.

Hi Matthew,

Thanks for the nudge.

I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license.

Tim Condit

From: Matthew Butterick notifications@github.com
Reply-To: mbutterick/pollen reply@reply.github.com
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:39 AM
To: mbutterick/pollen pollen@noreply.github.com
Cc: Tim Condit tcondit@gmail.com, Mention mention@noreply.github.com
Subject: [mbutterick/pollen] Switch to MIT license (#213)

@leafac
@sorawee
@LeifAndersen
@samth
@otherjoel
@jonboiser
@j3parker
@AlexKnauth
@tcondit
@rrthomas
@odanoburu
@matiasz
@gmlewis
@bennn
@basus
@Singletoned

Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Pollen from the LGPL to MIT.

Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of you, the esteemed contributors.

If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license."

On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove your code. Thanks.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

Hi Matthew, Thanks for the nudge. I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license. Tim Condit From: Matthew Butterick <notifications@github.com> Reply-To: mbutterick/pollen <reply@reply.github.com> Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:39 AM To: mbutterick/pollen <pollen@noreply.github.com> Cc: Tim Condit <tcondit@gmail.com>, Mention <mention@noreply.github.com> Subject: [mbutterick/pollen] Switch to MIT license (#213) @leafac @sorawee @LeifAndersen @samth @otherjoel @jonboiser @j3parker @AlexKnauth @tcondit @rrthomas @odanoburu @matiasz @gmlewis @bennn @basus @Singletoned Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Pollen from the LGPL to MIT. Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of you, the esteemed contributors. If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense my contributions to Pollen under the MIT license." On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove your code. Thanks. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

Woops, missed this, sorry about that.

This is fine by me.

Woops, missed this, sorry about that. This is fine by me.

Thanks for your help everyone! Enjoy the new license.

Labels Milestones

Switch to MIT license #213