aoc-racket

You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

This repo is archived. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues/pull-requests.

2015 edition

Racket solutions & explanations for the Advent of Code puzzles. Written in Racket's literate-programming dialect, scribble/lp2.

Install from the command line:

raco pkg install aoc-racket

Explanations will be installed automatically as part of the Scribble documentation.

Solutions in the respective annual subdirectories.

The problems are often designed around a particular computer-y abstraction. If you notice what the abstraction is, and then find the closest analog in Racket, the solution tends to come together quickly. Otherwise, you can spend a lot of time reinventing the wheel.
Complex numbers are a nice way of modeling two-dimensional positions.
Use lists whenever feasible, because there are many useful list functions in the Racket library that don’t have vector equivalents. In particular, these list functions are very useful, especially argmin and argmax.
Vectors are better than lists in situations where you need random access to members.
eq? is the fastest equality check, but it only works for symbols and fixnums (therefore, use more symbols and fixnums so you can use eq?!)
match is fantastic.
Association lists (= lists of pairs) are underrated. They’re compatible with all the usual list functions, of course, but also dictionary forms (like dict-ref and in-dict).
The graph library can be helpful for graph-based problems.
It’s good to know about sets and mutable pairs.
Also the fancier for iterators, like for/first and for/or.
let/ec is a way of jumping out of a deeply nested computation, akin to how return works in other languages.

I try to write solutions that are succinct but not cryptic.
I don’t optimize for speed.
I like doing the Advent of Code problems because it forces me to use parts of Racket that I don’t ordinarily use. So I treat it as a chance to expand my awareness of the Racketverse.
I’m unlikely to finish every problem. Judging by past years, there is a point where the problems get sufficiently complex that I’d rather put that time into improving my other Racket projects 🤘