soft hyphen victory

main
Matthew Butterick 6 years ago
parent f61cd2b8db
commit 70c1fd68f2

@ -28,97 +28,82 @@
#:finish-wrap-proc procedure?) . ->* . (listof any/c))
(define start-signal (gensym))
(define (nonprinting-at-start? x) (zero? (distance x 'start)))
(define (nonprinting-at-middle? x) (zero? (distance x)))
(define (nonprinting-at-end? x) (zero? (distance x 'end)))
(define (finish-wrap pieces) (finish-wrap-proc (reverse (dropf pieces (λ (x) (and (optional-break? x) (nonprinting-at-end? x)))))))
(define (finish-wrap pieces) (finish-wrap-proc (reverse (dropf pieces (λ (x) (and (optional-break? x)
(nonprinting-at-end? x)))))))
(define last-optional-break-k #f)
(call/prompt ;; continuation boundary for last-optional-break-k
(thunk
(define (capture-optional-break-k!) (let/cc k (set! last-optional-break-k k) #f))
(for/fold ([segments null]
[pieces null]
[dist-so-far start-signal]
#:result (append* (reverse (cons (finish-wrap pieces) segments))))
([x (in-list xs)])
(define at-start? (eq? dist-so-far start-signal))
(define underflow? (and (not at-start?) (<= (+ dist-so-far (distance x 'end)) target-size)))
(define (add-to-segment) (values segments (cons x pieces) (if at-start?
(distance x 'start)
(+ dist-so-far (distance x)))))
(define (insert-break [before? #f])
;; a break can be inserted before or after the current quad.
;; At an ordinary break (mandatory or optional) it goes after the wrap point.
;; The wrap signal consumes the break if it's nonprinting (e.g., word space or hard break)
;; but not if it's printing (e.g., hyphen).
;; But if no ordinary break can be found for a line, the wrap will happen before the quad.
;; The wrap signal will not consume the quad (rather, it will become the first quad in the next wrap)
;; In both cases, the `finish-wrap` proc will strip off any trailing white breaks from the new segment.
(define-values (pieces-for-this-wrap pieces-for-next-wrap starting-distance-for-next-wrap)
(if before?
(values pieces (list x) (distance x 'start))
(values (if (nonprinting-at-end? x) pieces (cons x pieces)) null start-signal)))
(values (list* (list break-val) (finish-wrap pieces-for-this-wrap) segments)
pieces-for-next-wrap
starting-distance-for-next-wrap))
(let loop ([segments null][pieces null][dist-so-far start-signal][xs xs])
(cond
[(mandatory-break? x)
;; easiest case. Always put a break where a mandatory break indicates (duh, or it's not mandatory)
(when debug (report x 'got-mandatory-break))
(insert-break)]
[(optional-break? x)
;; hardest case, because behavior of optional breaks depends on location in the wrap, and printability
[(null? xs)
;; combine the segments into a flat list, and drop any trailing breaks
;; (on the idea that breaks should separate things, and there's nothing left to separate)
(dropf-right (append* (reverse (cons (finish-wrap pieces) segments))) (λ (x) (eq? x break-val)))]
[else
(define x (car xs))
(define at-start? (eq? dist-so-far start-signal))
(define underflow? (and (not at-start?) (<= (+ dist-so-far (distance x 'end)) target-size)))
(define (add-to-segment) (loop segments
(cons x pieces)
(if at-start?
(distance x 'start)
(+ dist-so-far (distance x)))
(cdr xs)))
(define (insert-break [before? #f])
;; a break can be inserted before or after the current quad.
;; At an ordinary break (mandatory or optional) it goes after the wrap point.
;; The wrap signal consumes the break if it's nonprinting (e.g., word space or hard break)
;; but not if it's printing (e.g., hyphen).
;; But if no ordinary break can be found for a line, the wrap will happen before the quad.
;; The wrap signal will not consume the quad (rather, it will become the first quad in the next wrap)
;; (we do this by resetting next-xs to the whole xs list)
;; In both cases, the `finish-wrap` proc will strip off any trailing white breaks from the new segment.
(define-values (pieces-for-this-wrap next-xs)
(if before?
(values pieces xs)
(values (if (nonprinting-at-end? x) pieces (cons x pieces)) (cdr xs))))
(loop (list* (list break-val) (finish-wrap pieces-for-this-wrap) segments)
null
start-signal
next-xs))
(cond
[(and at-start? (nonprinting-at-start? x))
;; a nonprinting optional break is something like a word space
;; we don't want to accumulate these at the front of a wrap. We want to start with a printable quad.
;; So skip them.
(when debug (report x 'skipping-opt-break-at-beginning))
(values segments null dist-so-far)]
[(and underflow? (capture-optional-break-k!))
;; This branch creates a continuation point for a later wrap.
;; on the first pass, it just marks the optional break as a potential break location.
;; if another optional break is encountered before a wrap is needed,
;; then it becomes the captured break.
;; Meaning, the continuation always points at the last available break.
;; Then, in an overflow situation (handled later in this cond)
;; the continuation is invoked, which causes the rest of this branch to be evaluated.
(when debug (report x 'resuming-breakpoint))
[(and at-start? (optional-break? x) (nonprinting-at-start? x))
(when debug (report x 'skipping-optional-break-at-beginning))
(loop segments null dist-so-far (cdr xs))]
[(or (mandatory-break? x)
(and underflow? (optional-break? x) (capture-optional-break-k!)))
(when debug (if (mandatory-break? x)
(report x 'got-mandatory-break)
(report x 'resuming-break-from-continuation)))
(set! last-optional-break-k #f) ;; prevents continuation loop
(insert-break)]
[(or underflow? (nonprinting-at-end? x))
;; we do want to accumulate nonprinting optional breaks (like wordspaces) in the middle.
;; in case we encounter a printing quad that fits on the line.
[(or underflow?
at-start? ;; assume printing (nonprinting were handled in first case)
(and (optional-break? x) (nonprinting-at-end? x)))
;; the easy case of accumulating quads in the middle of a wrap
;; we do want to accumulate nonprinting optional breaks (like wordspaces and soft hyphens) in the middle.
;; in case we eventually encounter a printing quad that fits on the line.
;; if we don't (ie. the line overflows) then they will get stripped by `finish-wrap`
(when debug (report x 'add-optional-break-nonprinting-or-underflow))
(add-to-segment)]
[at-start?
;; this branch is only reached if the first quad on the line causes an overflow
;; with `at-start?` this branch is also reached if the first quad on the line causes an overflow
;; That sounds weird, but maybe it's just really big.
(when debug (report x 'add-optional-break-overflow+printing+at-start))
(when debug (report x 'add-ordinary-quad))
(add-to-segment)]
[else
;; this case is equivalent to the final case of the enclosing cond
;; where we have an overflow and no available optional break
;; so we just break before and move on
(when debug (report x 'add-optional-break-overflow+printing+not-at-start))
(insert-break 'before)])]
[(or at-start? underflow?)
;; the easy case of accumulating quads in the middle of a wrap
(when debug (report x 'add-ordinary-quad))
(add-to-segment)]
;; the previous branch will catch all `underflow?` cases
;; therefore, in these last two cases, we have overflow
[last-optional-break-k ;; overflow implied
;; if we have an optional break stored, we jump back and use it
;; now that we know we need it.
(when debug (report x 'invoking-last-breakpoint))
(last-optional-break-k #t)]
[else ;; overflow implied
;; if we don't have an optional break stored, we need to just end the wrap and move on
;; we insert the break `before` so that the current quad is moved to the next wrap
;; no, it's not going to look good, but if we reach this point, we are in weird conditions
(when debug (report x 'falling-back))
(insert-break 'before)])))))
;; the previous branch will catch all `underflow?` cases
;; therefore, in these last two cases, we have overflow
[last-optional-break-k ;; overflow implied
;; if we have an optional break stored, we jump back and use it
;; now that we know we need it.
(when debug (report x 'invoking-last-breakpoint))
(last-optional-break-k #t)]
[else ;; overflow implied
;; if we don't have an optional break stored, we need to just end the wrap and move on
;; we insert the break `before` so that the current quad is moved to the next wrap
;; no, it's not going to look good, but if we reach this point, we are in weird conditions
(when debug (report x 'falling-back))
(insert-break 'before)])])))))
(define x (q #f #\x))
@ -195,15 +180,14 @@
(check-equal? (linewrap (list shy) 1) (list))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list shy shy) 2) (list))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list shy shy shy) 2) (list))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x shy) 1 42) (list x))
#|
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 1) (list x 'lb x 'lb shy 'lb x 'lb x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 2) (list x x 'lb shy x 'lb x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x shy) 1) (list x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x shy shy shy shy) 1) (list x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 1) (list x 'lb x 'lb x 'lb x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 2) (list x x 'lb x x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 3) (list x x shy 'lb x x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 4) (list x x shy 'lb x x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 4) (list x x shy x x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x x) 5) (list x x shy x x))
|#
)
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x shy x sp x) 4) (list x x shy x 'lb x)))
(test-case
"zero width nonbreakers"
@ -215,10 +199,10 @@
(test-case
"mandatory breaks"
(check-equal? (linewrap (list br) 2) (list 'lb))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list br) 2) (list)) ;; only insert a break if it's between things
(check-equal? (linewrap (list a br b) 2) (list a 'lb b))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list a b br) 2) (list a b 'lb))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list a b br br) 2) (list a b 'lb 'lb))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list a b br) 2) (list a b))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list a b br br) 2) (list a b))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x br x x) 3) (list x 'lb x x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x br x) 3) (list x x 'lb x))
(check-equal? (linewrap (list x x x x) 3) (list x x x 'lb x))

Loading…
Cancel
Save