switch to MIT license #20

Closed
opened 5 years ago by mbutterick · 3 comments
mbutterick commented 5 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

@AlexKnauth
@samth
@lijunsong

Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Sugar from LGPL to MIT.

Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of you, the esteemed contributors.

If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license."

On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove your code. Thanks.

@AlexKnauth @samth @lijunsong Consistent with [Racket’s overall relicensing](https://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/11/completing-racket-s-relicensing-effort.html) from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Sugar from LGPL to MIT. Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of you, the esteemed contributors. If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license." On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove your code. Thanks.
AlexKnauth commented 5 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

I hereby relicense my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license.

I hereby relicense my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license.
lijunsong commented 5 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

I hereby relicense my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license.

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:48 AM Matthew Butterick notifications@github.com
wrote:

@AlexKnauth https://github.com/AlexKnauth
@samth https://github.com/samth
@lijunsong https://github.com/lijunsong

Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing
https://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/11/completing-racket-s-relicensing-effort.html
from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Sugar from LGPL to MIT.

Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of
you, the esteemed contributors.

If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense
my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license."

On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove
your code. Thanks.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/mbutterick/sugar/issues/20?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAITWKTTHFABP3EOJBIIJZDQUP4EBA5CNFSM4JPEOOL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4H2LXH7A,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAITWKULR5NEUGRUDLX3DKDQUP4EBANCNFSM4JPEOOLQ
.

I hereby relicense my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:48 AM Matthew Butterick <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @AlexKnauth <https://github.com/AlexKnauth> > @samth <https://github.com/samth> > @lijunsong <https://github.com/lijunsong> > > Consistent with Racket’s overall relicensing > <https://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/11/completing-racket-s-relicensing-effort.html> > from LGPL to Apache+MIT, I’d like to move Sugar from LGPL to MIT. > > Because the MIT license is more permissive, this requires the assent of > you, the esteemed contributors. > > If you agree, please post a message saying so, e.g. — "I hereby relicense > my contributions to Sugar under the MIT license." > > On January 1, if you have not agreed to the relicensing, I will remove > your code. Thanks. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/mbutterick/sugar/issues/20?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAITWKTTHFABP3EOJBIIJZDQUP4EBA5CNFSM4JPEOOL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4H2LXH7A>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAITWKULR5NEUGRUDLX3DKDQUP4EBANCNFSM4JPEOOLQ> > . >
mbutterick commented 4 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

Closed by 3ce9a7c650

Closed by 3ce9a7c650e87814eeccc23dc63753b6a94be7b0
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mbutterick/sugar#20
Loading…
There is no content yet.