Project server: consider using --local switch by default? #220

Closed
opened 4 years ago by Macavirus · 3 comments
Macavirus commented 4 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

Not using this by default relies on user finding much later in docs that they have insecurely opened a port to the wide internet.

I think secure-by-default probably makes more sense, and explicitly opening the port when desired can be done by adding a flag, or using another tool like ngrok.

Not using this by default relies on user finding much later in docs that they have insecurely opened a port to the wide internet. I think secure-by-default probably makes more sense, and explicitly opening the port when desired can be done by adding a flag, or using another tool like `ngrok`.
mbutterick commented 4 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

I’m not going to change the behavior, but I’ve added a note to the Quick Tour.

I’m not going to change the behavior, but I’ve added a note to the Quick Tour.
Macavirus commented 4 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

Great! Appreciate the quick fix

Great! Appreciate the quick fix
mbutterick commented 4 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

See also #143

See also #143
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mbutterick/pollen#220
Loading…
There is no content yet.