@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ I welcome pull requests. But accepting a PR obligates me to maintain that code f
* PRs should avoid reinventing features that already exist in Racket.
* I follow these principles too, because they’re virtuous habits. Still, I created Pollen as a tool for my writing and typography work. If a certain PR would negatively impact that work, I can’t accept it.
* If you’re new to Pollen or Racket, your PRis more likely to be declined, because certain things you perceive as bugs are actually features, certain things you perceive as missing are actually present, and certain limitations you perceive as surmountable are actually not. (Seealso point #1 re: backdrop of ignorance.)
* PRs that could have unit tests, and don’t, will be treated harshly. As they should.