You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
This repo is archived. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues/pull-requests.

39 lines
3.4 KiB

#lang pollen
(define-meta title "why does typography matter?")
hanging-topic[(topic-from-metas metas)]{Conserves reader attention}
Typography matters because it helps conserve the most valuable resource you have as a writer em{reader attention}.
Attention is the readers gift to you. That gift is precious. It is finite. And if you fail to be a respectful steward of that gift, it will be revoked.
Once your reader revokes the gift of attention, youve achieved only the lowest form of writing. Yes, you scattered some words across some pages. But your reader disappeared. So what was the point? Your writing might as well be a random string of characters. Like the proverbial tree falling in the woods, no ones there to notice the difference.
What could be more presumptuous? Or dangerous?
Writing as if you have unlimited reader attention is presumptuous because readers arent doing you a favor. Reading your writing is not their hobby. Its their job. And their job involves paying attention to lots of other writing. Your judge has not set aside your motion for summary judgment so she can savor it during her upcoming vacation to Maui. More likely, its just one document in a pile of hundreds, all competing for her attention.
Ill even go one better: I believe that most readers are looking for reasons to stop reading. Not because theyre malicious or aloof. Theyre just being efficient. Readers who have other demands on their time meaning, all of them cant afford to pay more attention than necessary. Thus, theyre always looking for the exit. Though legal writers routinely ignore this fact, they do so at their peril.
Consider an oral argument in court. By the day of the hearing, youll have spent a lot of time on the structure and substance of your argument. But do you show up to court in jeans and sneakers? No, of course not. You wear proper court attire. And when you speak to the court, do you read from your notes in a monotone? No, of course not. You vary your cadence. You gesture. You extemporize.
You do these things because you dont merely want to be seen and heardyou want to persuade. To persuade, you need to hold the courts attention. And to hold that attention, you cant undermine your argument with distractions.
Its the same on the printed page. The text matters the most, but if thats all that mattered, then everything could be set in 12-point Times New Roman. And that would be the equivalent of speaking in a monotone. In the same way that good speaking skills matter during an oral argument, good typography matters in a written document.
Writers skeptical of typography often say, No one cares how a text looks. They just focus on the substance. This is plainly absurd. Our experiences as readers repeatedly prove the opposite is true.
Typography matters. The only question is whether youas a writer and as a lawyerare going to neglect it.
The substancepresentation distinction has always been a false dichotomy, because the two overlap. Juries, for instance, are not merely allowed but encouraged to draw conclusions about witness credibility and by extension, the facts themselves from the presentation of the testimony. (See, e.g., California Civil Jury Instruction 5003, which tells the jury to consider How did the witness look, act, and speak while testifying?)