Use nonnegative-integer? in favor of natural-number?
The natural-number? predicate seems to be unavailable (though there is a remnant of it in the form of natural-number/c, which is just a contract alias of exact-nonnegative-integer?). In any case, it surely means nonnegative integer. (One might push the envelope here slightly and add exactness, but this commit does not go that far.)dev-subparser
parent
84f2fc2b97
commit
2e8f5e42be
Loading…
Reference in New Issue