Incorrect contract for previous-line function #19

Closed
opened 6 years ago by slaymaker1907 · 2 comments
slaymaker1907 commented 6 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

The contract seems to specify that it always return exact-nonnegative-integer? but it may return #f if on the first line. This does not seem to be checked currently otherwise the indentation example in the book would fail.

The contract seems to specify that it always return exact-nonnegative-integer? but it may return #f if on the first line. This does not seem to be checked currently otherwise the indentation example in the book would fail.
mbutterick commented 6 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

The code seems to be right; the documentation was wrong.

The code seems to be right; the documentation was wrong.
mbutterick commented 6 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

Thanks!

Thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mbutterick/beautiful-racket#19
Loading…
There is no content yet.